Compatibility check
A short assessment of fit. Confidential, no commitment.
It's the migration risk, the integration drag, the "we'll fix that later" backlog, and the quiet erosion of operational confidence while the new system is being stood up. Most of how Fedora sells itself is built around removing those costs, not denying they exist.
How we move customers onto Fedora
Most software companies sell you the destination and leave getting there to someone else. Our path is built around evaluation first, commitment second.
A short assessment of fit. Confidential, no commitment.
Your team gets a working Fedora environment to evaluate.
You operate inside Fedora for a defined evaluation window.
Cut over only if it earned the move. If it didn't, walk away.
What this means in practice
Most software vendors treat data migration as a service line. We've built it into the system itself. Schemas, mapping, validation, and rollback all live in code, with the customer's source data as input.
Thirty days of live operations alongside the existing stack. Reporting, permissions, and workflows have to work for the customer before there's any pressure to switch. If they don't, the customer keeps what they have.
Most platforms treat migration as a services line item. We don't. The work that would otherwise be a multi-month consulting engagement is absorbed into how the platform works, and that's reflected in the commercial deal.
Start the assessment
A compatibility check tells you which systems Fedora would replace, what migration looks like, and where the risks are. It's free and takes about 30 minutes.